Fri Aug 14 17:28:08 2020
<8f79fcda> <http://looserounds.com/2020/08/14/breaking-duncan-v-becerra-9th-circuit-9th-circuit-rules-that-the-ban-on-possession-of-magazines-that-hold-more-than-ten-rounds-of-ammunition-violates-the-2nd-amendment/|http://looserounds.com/2020/08/14/breaking-duncan-v-becerra-9th-circuit-9th-circuit-rules-that-the-ban-on-possession-of-magazines-that-hold-more-than-ten-rounds-of-ammunition-violates-the-2nd-amendment/>
— BREAKING: Duncan v Becerra (9th Circuit): 9th Circuit rules that the ban on possession of magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition violates the 2nd Amendment. ⋆ LooseRounds.com
— 2 DUNCAN V.BECERRABefore: Consuelo M. Callahan and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges, and Barbara M. G. Lynn,* District Judge.Opinion by Judge Lee; Dissent by Judge Lynn SUMMARY**Second AmendmentThe panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs challenging California Government Code § 31310, which bans possession of large-capacity magazines (“LCMs”) that hold more … Read more BREAKING: Duncan v Becerra (9th Circuit): 9th Circuit rules that the ban on possession of magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition violates the 2nd Amendment.
<8f79fcda> Get fucked CA “judiciary”